People want to have affordable housing. People want to eat
vegetables without the fear of being poisoned. The second statement seemingly
is a non sequitur. But it doesn’t have to be. Here is where sensible rustic planning
comes in.
Thanks to the Land Justice League’s report on InmediaHK, we
are told that the SAR government is planning to develop a new town in Yuen Long
South and is applying to LegCo for funds of about HK$50 million to be used in
hiring consultants to do planning and engineering studies in identifying
suitable housing sites.
According to this document issued by the Development Bureau,
the studies will form the basis for an official Outline Development Plan
(equivalent to an Outline Zoning Plan in urban areas):
The Land Justice League has conducted some on-site
investigation and found that a substantial amount of farming activities have
been on-going for a long time covering over 10 hectares of land within the area
earmarked for the studies. Most of the farmers are vegetable growers who have
made a livelihood out of farming on land leased from the indigenous villagers.
The vegetables that they grow are sold through distributors to the Cheung Sha
Wan wholesale market. Hong Kongers should be grateful that they still have the
choice of safe, Hong Kong grown vegetables because of
the hard work of those farmers.
Since the announcement of the earmarking of the study area,
a few farmers reportedly have noticed some anomaly where some landowners have begun
ending the farm leases and resuming their land.
The LJL report made one very valid point, and that is, that
by arbitrarily making public a tentative map showing the study area, the administration is actually hinting to
developers, especially those who are familiar with the land use conversion
procedure, where to sweep up agricultural land for their hoard. (I took great
pains in trying to explain in my book Land
and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong how the large developers use this land
use conversion procedure to their competitive advantage. I also made it quite
clear that this land use conversion procedure should be thoroughly reviewed
with regard to its fairness and efficiency.)
One very sound point made in the LJL report is that whenever government plans to develop a new
town, all developers’ hoard of agricultural land in the area in question should
first be resumed by government and then properly zoned and put up for public
auction.
Suspected government-developer collusion aside, a crucial
question to ask is: must the land in the New
Territories be solely used to pile
concrete on? In the present times when there’s one report after another of
poisonous vegetables being shipped to Hong Kong from north of the border, isn’t
it about time for the planners to begin thinking outside the (concrete) box and
start looking seriously at farming as a viable local industry, food safety and sustainable
agricultural land use? Is there a way for housing and farm land to co-exist?
Apart from farm use, are there other compatible uses like open air farm produce
markets, flea markets, cooked food markets etc. (like those popular “marches”
in urban and suburban France)
that can be considered as viable zoning?
While I concur with the suggestion in the report that the
land currently being used for farming should be taken out of the study area
altogether to protect the farmers, I think we could go one step further and
start considering the active preservation of agricultural land for exclusive
agricultural use (i.e. application for land use change not to be allowed).
As early as the 70s, British Columbia
already saw the importance of agricultural land preservation. The province introduced
the Agricultural Land Commission Act in April 1973. An Agricultural Land
Commission was set up and charged with the duty to designate a provincial
Agricultural Land Reserve (“ALR”) and to encourage farm businesses. The ALR
presently covers an area of 4.7 million hectares (5 percent of the province)
and is a special zoning in which agricultural use is recognized as the priority
use. It is typically difficult to apply for non-farm use where such a zoning
exists.
Hong Kong may find the British
Columbia experience worth studying.
2 comments:
When land availability and use is at such a premium as it is in Hong Kong then the land given over to farming must be a priority. I lived in Gibraltar once, there was no fertile land and everything was given over to building and development including reclaiming land from the sea, all food was imported. Maybe in Hong Kong growing vegetables, herbs etc on rooftop gardens is a way forward, communal gardens are being developed in the UK, often in densely packed, inner-city areas. Roof gardens can look spectacular, have a search for the University of Warsaw's library, and can also lower heat emissions from buildings
a jar of the finest pickled planning!
Post a Comment