This
was one the best historical novels I’ve read so far and I’m really glad to have
found this author. The novel’s only minor weakness is its length (936 pages)
and I personally feel it could’ve been trimmed down a bit without losing any of
its flavors. I was fully immersed except for a few places where the story veers
off with insignificant side stories. I can certainly see why so many historical
fiction aficionados on Goodreads raved about the novel.
I’m
one of those historical fiction fans who are particularly drawn to the Wars of
the Roses in English history. Previously I had read Conn Iggulden’s Stormbird
and Bloodline, Paul Doherty’s Roseblood and Philippa Gregory’s The White Queen.
So going into Penman’s epic, I’m already quite familiar with the historical
characters and the family trees. But none of those novels gives a detailed
description of Richard III. Having watched last year BBC’s TV series The Hollow
Crown – The War of the Roses, which is based on Shakespeare’s plays, I became hooked
on Richard III. In fact I’ve had The Sunne in Splendour on my to-read list for
almost two years and I am very pleased to have finally read it.
The
novel is divided into four books.
Book
One deals with the violent conflict between Marguerite of Anjou (Henry VI’s
queen) and Richard of York who tries to make a claim for the throne due to
Henry VI’s mental infirmity, how Richard’s son Edward eventually ascends the
throne with the help of the Kingmaker Richard Neville of Warwick, marries the
avaricious and conniving Elizabeth Woodville, and later, caught between his
wife’s power grabbing demands and those of Warwick, goes into a vehement
showdown with the latter.
Book
Two introduces Anne, younger daughter of Warwick, who falls deeply in love with
Richard, Edward’s loyal younger brother, but who is made a victim and pawn in
the vortex of scheming politics involving Edward, Warwick, George of Clarence
(Edward’s traitorous younger brother) and Marguerite of Anjou. First she is
forbidden by Edward to marry Richard, then she is forced to marry Marguerite’s
son Edouard of Lancaster, heir to Henry VI. The hostility between Edward and
Warwick deepens as the latter uses George as a puppet to rival for the throne.
When Edouard is killed in battle and Marguerite concedes defeat at last, Anne
is finally reunited with Richard and marries him.
Book
Three tells how Edward leads a debauched and dissolute life, while having to
parry aggression from France and deal with growing discontent at home. He
relies on Richard to fight his battles and in governance. George discovers a
big secret about Edward’s marriage; Elizabeth learns about this, becomes paranoid
and urges Edward to kill George, which he eventually does, to Richard’s utter
dismay. (spoiler) It turns out that Edward had a plight-troth with a lady prior
to his marriage to Elizabeth, thus making it illegal and his children bastards
(spoiler). Edward then becomes very ill and dies, willing Richard to be the
Protector of his heir.
Book
Four is about Richard’s claim of protectorship, and later of kingship when he
learns of Edward’s secret and when Anne convinces him of necessity for their
son’s safety. Once crowned, he finds himself betrayed time and again by people
he thinks he can trust. The most egregious betrayal surfaces when he is blamed
for the disappearance of Edward’s two sons from custody in the Tower. Meanwhile
he has to deflect ploys by Elizabeth and her allies who are plotting his murder. Then misfortune begins to pile on him. His son and heir dies; then
Anne dies. He begins to regret having claimed the throne. At the same time,
Henry Tudor, aided by France, emerges to rival with him for the throne. At the
fateful Battle of Redmore Plain (Battle of Bosworth Field), Richard III is
killed, dying a gruesome death and ending the Plantagenet line.
The
strengths of the novel are aplenty: seamless weaving of fact and fiction; fluid
and lucid writing style; tension-building deploy of twists and turns and
heartfelt dialogue. In my view, the greatest strength lies in the author’s
depiction through dialogue and action and thought processes of the intricate
relationships between the various main actors, giving these characters true-to-life
dimensions. Those relationships, shaded by torn loyalties, goodwill,
compassion, betrayal, greed selfishness, envy and hatred, are striking because
they speak right to our human heart. That being said, I do tend to agree with
one reviewer’s comment that the characterization of Richard III may be
over-romanticized.
As
a fan of serious historical fiction, I am keen on learning history through reading
historical novels and particularly appreciate that Penman tries to stay close
to what are known as true historical facts and only exercises artistic license
where there are gaps and blanks.
I’m
giving this novel 4.5 stars, rounding up to 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment