After
an intriguing start, this novel leads you into a tunnel of darkness, desolation
and despair, where you will see no light until you reach the final Part. Once
you are there, you will get your cathartic relief with the denouement of a
simple but suspenseful plot. I am so glad that my Goodreads friends encouraged
me to keep going when, at one point, I was on the verge of quitting, as some
parts were particularly difficult for me to read. Indeed, it was definitely
worth reading to the end. I’m giving the novel 3.5 stars.
It
is in the main a story of an abjectly deprived, 23-year-old student’s agonizing
psychological journey from the moment he commits two murders based on a wild
theory that he divines, right through to the time of his confession to police.
Through his internal debate, the reader is made to ponder the philosophical questions
raised: do geniuses like Napoleon have the right to destroy things or people
they consider as obstacles? Do such extraordinary individuals have the right to
make laws for the rest of mankind, that is, ordinary folks, for the greater
good? Even in the early days of imprisonment, the protagonist still obstinately
believes that his theory has nothing wrong. We, as readers, can’t help but
wonder too.
“Of course, many of the benefactors of
mankind who snatched power for themselves instead of inheriting it ought to
have been punished at their first steps. But those men succeeded and so they
were right, and I didn’t, and so I had no right to have taken that step.”
Throughout
the novel, the reader is made aware of the fact that the protagonist is by
nature a kind-hearted and compassionate man who loves his family and friends
and who cares for the destitute and the weak. He is also made out to be a
learned intellectual who has an acute sense of right and wrong. The reader is
thus constantly put through the dilemma of whether to sympathize with him or
condemn him outright for the cold-blooded crime. The author’s skill at
characterization is quite beyond question, although personally I would’ve have
liked the long-winded dialogues cut short a tad. But the emotional ending more
than makes up for that little flaw.
My
final verdict: Do I think Dostoyevsky is a brilliant author? Yes, definitely. Did
I enjoy reading this novel? It’s not exactly my cup of tea.
No comments:
Post a Comment