In
reading this review, please be warned that I have only limited knowledge of
philosophy and “Candide” is a reputed philosophical satire.
I'm
just going to record what I was able to grasp. The moral of the story would
appear to be that since there is a limitless amount of unpredictable chaos in
life, much of which is catastrophic, evil and wretched, be it man-made (like
rape, war, massacre, plague, religious intolerance) or from force majeure (like
earthquake, shipwreck), that one can be easily tempted to give up all hope on
mankind, but that despair is not the answer.
The
author takes the protagonist Candide from place to place, putting him through
the most horrible ordeals in order to make him see the falsity in the
philosophical thinking mode of his teacher Dr. Pangloss, which is unadulterated
optimism no matter how dire the life situation is. In the end, Candide has seen
too much absurdity and pain in life and evil in people to still believe in
Pangloss's theory. But neither does that mean life is not worth living. Candide
has come to learn that humans by nature have a penchant for living, no matter
how harrowing life is (as the old woman who has survived unspeakable atrocities
says, 'A hundred times I wanted to kill myself, but still I loved life!').
So
perhaps some measure of deprivation and evil is actually beneficial, because it
gives purpose and contrast to life. Besides, too much comfort and complacency
only breeds boredom and lethargy (like the rich Venetian nobleman Pococurante
who has everything but shows no interest in anything). Candide finally comes to
the conclusion that "we must cultivate our garden", meaning that
despite all, we should all strive to develop our own individual talent for our
own good and the good of society.
I rather like the uplifting conclusion. I just feel that in terms of philosophical notion, it sounds a bit like Albert Camus's absurdism and revolt.
I rather like the uplifting conclusion. I just feel that in terms of philosophical notion, it sounds a bit like Albert Camus's absurdism and revolt.
No comments:
Post a Comment